MBFR — ~1 MWe Net Demonstrator (v2)

Small, net-positive direct-drive micro-burst reactor: operating points, driver layout, timing, and acceptance tests

Table of Contents
  1. Executive summary
  2. Net-positive operating points
  3. Economy of scale & cost of electricity
  4. Operating modes (1 Hz vs 5 Hz vs 10 Hz)
  5. 4096-brick driver — how the “many small lasers” combine
  6. Single-seed timing & jitter budget
  7. Dual-chamber handover & buffer sizing
  8. Pellet tracking & targeting accuracy
  9. Meters & acceptance test (for policymakers)
  10. Figures

Executive summary

This demonstrator aims to be net-electric positive while staying small enough for fast licensing and rapid iteration. The most defensible point is 2 MJ/shot @ 5 Hz with G≈35, laser wall-plug ≈15%, and auxiliaries ≈ 0.5 MWe. That combination yields about +0.9 MWe net (≈1 MWe-class) while keeping window fluence, panel apertures, and pellet logistics modest.

Net-positive operating points

Net ≥ 0 if and only if:
Ef·f × ( ηth→e − 1/(G·ηlaser) ) ≥ Paux

With G=35, ηlaser=0.15, ηth→e=0.33, the bracket is 0.1395. Below are concrete points that clear net.

Case Ef (MJ) Hz G ηlaser Paux (MWe) Pth (MW) Gross MWe Laser elec (MWe) Net MWe
A — 4 MJ @ 1 Hz (low-rep net) 4.00 1.00 35 0.15 0.30 4.00 1.32 0.76 0.26
B — 2 MJ @ 2 Hz (minimum net) 2.00 2.00 35 0.15 0.50 4.00 1.32 0.76 0.06
C — 2 MJ @ 5 Hz (recommended demo) 2.00 5.00 35 0.15 0.50 10.00 3.30 1.90 0.90
D — 2 MJ @ 10 Hz (clear net) 2.00 10.00 35 0.15 1.00 20.00 6.60 3.81 1.79
E — 2 MJ @ 1 Hz (efficiency boost) 2.00 1.00 40 0.20 0.30 2.00 0.66 0.25 0.11
F — 4 MJ @ 1 Hz (higher gain) 4.00 1.00 40 0.15 0.30 4.00 1.32 0.67 0.35

Recommendation: start at Case C (2 MJ @ 5 Hz) for a clean net-positive claim; qualify 1 Hz physics at 4 MJ (Case A) during bring-up.

Economy of scale & cost of electricity

Using the demonstrator (Case C, ≈0.9 MWe net) as a reference, we can fit your cost points (0.5, 0.9, 2, 4, 10, 20, 50 MWe) with a simple power-law:

C(P) ≈ 352 P−0.48  [US$/MWh], where P is net electrical output in MWe. This reproduces the demo-scale values (≈370 US$/MWh at 0.9 MWe) and can be used to project larger plants. For illustration, taking 1 US$ ≈ ₹80 gives the following indicative levelized costs:

Net plant size
(MWe)
Approx. cost
(US$/MWh)
Approx. cost
(₹/kWh)
0.9 (this demo)≈ 371≈ 29.6
2≈ 253≈ 20.2
10≈ 117≈ 9.3
50≈ 54≈ 4.3
100≈ 39≈ 3.1
200≈ 28≈ 2.2
500≈ 18≈ 1.4
1000≈ 13≈ 1.0
5000≈ 6≈ 0.47
10000≈ 4≈ 0.34

These are order-of-magnitude figures assuming MBFR capital and fixed O&M scale mainly with shielding, driver hardware, and tritium systems, while fuel and pellet-factory costs stay nearly flat per MWh. Under those assumptions, national-grid-scale MBFR stations (≳1 GWe net) drive LCOE well below 1 ₹/kWh, and multi-GW “fusion harbours” or propulsion power-plants for ships and spacecraft push it even lower.

Operating modes (1 Hz vs 5 Hz vs 10 Hz)

4096-brick driver — how the “many small lasers” combine

Single-seed timing & jitter budget

Dual-chamber handover & buffer sizing

Two chambers alternate so availability stays high. The thermal handover between chambers is on the order of ~60 s; a small molten-salt buffer rides this short ramp so the turbine island sees nearly constant power. Longer 5–10 minute pauses are reserved for diagnostics and maintenance at reduced load, not full-rate buffering.

Pellet tracking & targeting accuracy

Meters & acceptance test (for policymakers)

Figures

MBFR chamber cross-section
Figure 1 — Chamber cross-section: injector, maser, beam panels, alpha capture, blanket stack, HX.
Detailed system block diagram
Figure 2 — System block: factory → injector → maser → UV panels → chamber → buffer → double-wall HX → power, with closed tritium loops.
UV panel arrangement
Figure 3 — UV panel arrangement (example: 12 panels totaling 256 beams; each panel carries ≈16–24 beamlets).
Heat and tritium loops
Figure 4 — Heat & tritium loops (helium-swept double-wall HX; DTU; pellet factory recirculation).